MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2397637026 · doi:10.1385/1-59745-214-9:253

Proteomic Analysis of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Treated With Ouabain

2006· article· en· W2397637026 on OpenAlexaff
Alexey V. Pshezhetsky

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOuabainVascular smooth muscleApoptosisTransfectionProteomeHeat shock proteinMolecular biologyCell biologyIntracellularChemistryBiologyGeneEndocrinologyBiochemistrySodiumSmooth muscle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) plays an important role in remodeling the vessel walls, one of the major determinants of long-term blood pressure elevation and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Apoptosis in VSMC can be inhibited by inversion of the intracellular [Na+]/[K+] ratio after the sustained blockage of the Na+,K+-ATPase by ouabain. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by tandem mass spectroscopy, we compared proteomes of control VSMC and of those with ouabain-inhibited Na+,K+-ATPase and found that ouabain treatment led to overexpression of numerous soluble and membrane-bound proteins. Among proteins, which showed the highest level of ouabain-induced expression, we identified mortalin (also known as GRP75 or PBP-74), a member of the heat shock protein 70 superfamily and a marker for cellular mortal and immortal phenotypes. Further experiments showed that mortalin RNA and protein levels are induced in ouabain-treated VSMC, and that transient transfection of cells with mortalin cDNA inhibited serum deprivation-induced apoptosis via inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene, p53.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207