Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke in Patients With Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Wegener's): A Population‐Based Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke in patients with newly diagnosed granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA) compared with that in controls from the general population. METHODS: Using a population-based database from the province of British Columbia, Canada, we conducted a matched cohort study in which each patient with incident GPA was matched for age, sex, and entry time with up to 10 individuals from the general population. Patients in the GPA cohort were required to have received at least 1 prescription for oral glucocorticoids, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, leflunomide, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, or rituximab within 1 month before or 6 months after the index date. We compared the incidence rates of MI and ischemic stroke between the 2 groups and calculated hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Among 504 patients with incident GPA (53.4% female, mean age 57.4 years), MI developed in 23 patients, and ischemic stroke developed in 18 patients (incidence rates of 11.7 per 1,000 person-years and 8.9 per 1,000 person-years, respectively). The incidence rates among 5,222 subjects without GPA were 5.2 per 1,000 person-years and 4.3 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. The multivariable HRs among GPA patients were 1.86 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.05-3.31) for MI and 1.50 (95% CI 0.78-2.89) for ischemic stroke. The age-, sex-, and entry time-matched HR for cardiovascular disease (composite outcome of MI or stroke) was highest during the first year after GPA diagnosis (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.37-6.08). CONCLUSION: Patients with GPA have a significantly increased risk of MI and a non-statistically significant trend toward an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Monitoring for this complication and vigilance in modifying risk factors are particularly warranted in this patient population, especially early after the diagnosis of GPA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".