[Effect of type 2 diabetes with hypertension on cognitive function-a study on elderly living in the communities of Beijing].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with hypertension on cognitive function in those community-based elderly who were aged 60 and over, in Beijing. METHODS: 82 patients with T2DM, 142 patients with both T2DM and hypertension and 277 normal controls were investigated in this study. Both methods as: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE)were used to determine cognitive change. RESULTS: The total MMSE scores showed significant decrease between T2DM with hypertension and controls [(28.42 ± 1.52) vs. (28.88 ± 1.47), P < 0.05]. The MoCA score of the total scores [(25.20 ± 3.91) vs. (26.50 ± 3.29), P < 0.05], sub-scores of visuospatial, executive [(3.60 ± 1.56) vs. (3.96 ± 1.18), P < 0.05] and language [(2.10 ± 0.80) vs. (2.37 ± 0.80), P < 0.05] significantly decreased in T2DM patients with hypertension and in the normal controls. Data from the Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that older age and less education were risk factors for cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: T2DM and hypertension damaged the cognitive function of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".