MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2398563542 · doi:10.18260/1-2--20028

Adding Flexibility and Hands-On Experiences while Minimizing Sequential Gaps in the ME Curriculum

2020· article· en· W2398563542 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matt Gordon, Bradley S. Davidson, Corinne Lengsfeld

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)CurriculumClass (philosophy)Process (computing)Quarter (Canadian coin)Computer scienceMathematics educationEngine departmentEngineering design processEngineering managementEngineeringPedagogyMechanical engineeringMathematicsPsychologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Adding Flexibility and Hands-On Experiences while Minimizing Sequential Gaps in the ME CurriculumThe Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at the University of Denverrecently undertook a strategic planning process to identify critical changes to the programneeded to address how the modern BSME degree is applied or will be utilized in thefuture. Three initiatives were implemented as a result of this process: (1) increase thenumber of hands-on experiences to differentiate from online curricula, (2) add flexibilityin general and in technical electives to allow students to tailor their educationalexperiences to their long term goals, and (3) minimize gaps between courses intended tobuild on each other. Hands-on experiences now exist in all but one quarter of our four-year curriculum. The experiences incorporate open ended design problems as well asthoughtfully constructed laboratory experiences. Flexibility has been added by allowingstudents to select three to four courses from pre-approved math and science courses, byopening up the timing of these courses as well as general educational requirements withinthe four year curriculum, by doubling the number of mechanical engineering technicalelectives available, and by allowing students to take technical electives from any of ourthree engineering programs (Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering).Moreover in collaboration with the University of Denver’s Law School, our students cannow satisfy a technical elective requirement by taking the Law School’s Introduction toIntellectual Property course. Finally the faculty worked to identify all follow-on coursesand rearranged the curriculum to minimize the gaps between one class to the next.Our objectives are to increase ratio of the number of students depositing to the programto the number of students accepted to the program, to increase the persistent rate ofstudents, and to increase the depth of learning as measured by the Fundamentals ofEngineering Exam. An early measure of our success can be observed though theselection of discipline by our students at the end of a two year common engineeringcurriculum. The freshman who entered or program in the Fall of 2011 represent the firstwave of students to enter this new format. Roughly 85% of this population selected aBSME over BSEE and BSCompE. Prior to 2011, roughly 50% of the students chose theBSME program. Additionally, during the past two years, our FE pass rates exceeded90%. These early findings suggest that it is possible for ME curricula to accommodatethe direction and desires of engineering students while exceeding ABET requirements

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207