Formation of the quaternary ammonium-linked glucuronide of nicotine in human liver microsomes: identification and stereoselectivity in the kinetics.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formation of the N1-glucuronide metabolite of each nicotine enantiomer was studied in pooled human liver microsomes (n = 6). The metabolite formed from natural S(-)-nicotine was identified by comparison of the high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) retention time and positive ion electrospray ionization-mass spectral characteristics with a synthetic reference standard. A radiometric HPLC method was used to quantify the metabolite. The specificity of the assay method was demonstrated by experiments in which beta-glucuronidase treatment of incubated assay samples resulted in elimination of the peak due to the N1-glucuronide metabolite. The glucuronides of S(-)- and R(+)-nicotine were formed by one-enzyme kinetics, with K(m) values of 0.11 and 0.23 mM and V(max) values of 132 and 70 pmol/min/mg of protein, respectively. There is marked stereoselectivity in the apparent intrinsic clearance values (V(max)/K(m)) in that the value for S(-)-nicotine is 4 times greater than for the R(+)-isomer (1.2 versus 0.31 microl/min/mg of protein).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".