MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2398626302

Formation of the quaternary ammonium-linked glucuronide of nicotine in human liver microsomes: identification and stereoselectivity in the kinetics.

2001· article· en· W2398626302 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Ghosheh, Sarvesh C. Vashishtha, Edward M. Hawes

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaboliteChemistryGlucuronideStereoselectivityChromatographyHigh-performance liquid chromatographyEnantiomerElectrospray ionizationGlucuronidationNicotineMicrosomeMass spectrometryStereochemistryEnzymeBiochemistryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of the N1-glucuronide metabolite of each nicotine enantiomer was studied in pooled human liver microsomes (n = 6). The metabolite formed from natural S(-)-nicotine was identified by comparison of the high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) retention time and positive ion electrospray ionization-mass spectral characteristics with a synthetic reference standard. A radiometric HPLC method was used to quantify the metabolite. The specificity of the assay method was demonstrated by experiments in which beta-glucuronidase treatment of incubated assay samples resulted in elimination of the peak due to the N1-glucuronide metabolite. The glucuronides of S(-)- and R(+)-nicotine were formed by one-enzyme kinetics, with K(m) values of 0.11 and 0.23 mM and V(max) values of 132 and 70 pmol/min/mg of protein, respectively. There is marked stereoselectivity in the apparent intrinsic clearance values (V(max)/K(m)) in that the value for S(-)-nicotine is 4 times greater than for the R(+)-isomer (1.2 versus 0.31 microl/min/mg of protein).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207