MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399058712 · doi:10.1097/yco.0000000000000222

How do resting state changes in depression translate into psychopathological symptoms? From ‘Spatiotemporal correspondence’ to ‘Spatiotemporal Psychopathology’

2015· review· en· W2399058712 on OpenAlexafffund
Georg Northoff

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Psychiatry · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDefault mode networkPsychopathologyAnterior cingulate cortexResting state fMRINeuroscienceMajor depressive disorderPsychologyPrefrontal cortexSalience (neuroscience)InsulaAmygdalaFunctional connectivityCognitionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the recent findings in resting-state activity in major depressive disorder (MDD) and link them to psychopathological symptoms. RECENT FINDINGS: MDD shows changes in resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) mainly within the default-mode network with a focus on especially the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex. rsFC in perigenual anterior cingulate cortex is abnormally high in MDD and decreased in the lateral prefrontal cortex with the central executive network (CEN). rsFC in other networks like the salience network, including the insula, amygdala, and supragenual anterior cingulate cortex and the sensorimotor network is also affected in MDD. SUMMARY: Resting-state activity in MDD shows abnormal topographical and spatiotemporal pattern. The spatiotemporal alterations in resting state may translate into corresponding spatiotemporal changes underlying the sensorimotor, affective, and cognitive functions, and thus, the various symptoms. Such spatiotemporal correspondence between resting state changes and psychopathological symptoms may make necessary the development of what I describe as 'Spatiotemporal Psychopathology'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in PsychiatrySame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207