MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399384755 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-998-2:133

Thin-Layer Chromatography Analysis of Human CYP3A-Catalyzed Testosterone 6β-Hydroxylation

2006· article· en· W2399384755 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Waxman, Thomas K. H. Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsHydroxylationChromatographyThin-layer chromatographyChemistryMetaboliteCYP3ACytochrome P450MicrosomeChloroformTestosterone (patch)EnzymeSilica gelSteroidAcetoneBiochemistryBiologyHormoneEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Testosterone and other steroid hormones have been studied as prototypic examples of endogenous substrates for hepatic cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes. CYP3A enzymes from various species, including human, metabolize testosterone by a 6beta-hydroxylation reaction, which is unique to this P450 subfamily. A thin-layer chromatographic method is described for the determination of 6beta-hydroxytestosterone formed enzymatically by incubation of [14C]-testosterone with cDNA-expressed CYP3A enzymes or liver microsomes. 14C-labeled enzymatic products are applied to silica gel thin-layer plates, which are developed sequentially with methylene chloride:acetone (80:20) followed by chloroform, ethyl acetate, and absolute ethanol (80:20:14). Metabolite quantification is performed by autoradiography and liquid scintillation counting. This method is applicable to enzymatic studies for the determination of CYP3A-dependent testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation activity in both human and animal liver microsomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207