MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2399945893 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2016.7472371

Carrier frequency and bandwidth estimation of cyclostationary multiband signals

2016· article· en· W2399945893 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Déborah Cohen, Liad Pollak, Yonina C. Eldar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsCyclostationary processBandwidth (computing)Nyquist rateRobustness (evolution)Cognitive radioComputer scienceSymbol rateAlgorithmElectronic engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Nyquist–Shannon sampling theoremTelecommunicationsBit error rateWirelessEngineeringSampling (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Communication signals are often cyclostationary, that is they have statistical characteristics that vary periodically in time. The cyclic spectrum, a characteristic function of such signals, exhibits spectral peaks at certain locations, called cyclic frequencies. These locations as well as the cyclic spectrum support are defined by the signal parameters, in particular carrier frequency, bandwidth and symbol rate. In this paper, we propose an estimation algorithm that extracts these from the signal cyclic spectrum. This algorithm can be applied to multiband signals, namely signals composed of more than one transmission. Prior to parameter estimation, the number of signals is first estimated. Exploiting the cyclostationarity of communication signals improves the robustness to noise of the parameter estimation. In particular, the proposed algorithm can be used for Cognitive Radios, which traditionally deal with low signal to noise ratios multiband signals, for spectrum sensing purposes by estimating the carrier frequencies and bandwidths. Simulations demonstrate estimation from synthesized and RF Nyquist samples as well as sub-Nyquist samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207