[Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and left ventricular aneurysm resection--a case report].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the case of a 55-year-old patient with coronary heart disease of class III of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), after cardiac antero-lateral wall infarction at unknown time. Coronarography revealed 90% occlusion of three branches of left coronary artery. Ventriculography showed dyskinetic aneurysm of apex and anterior wall without presence of thrombus. On the basis of the performed examination the patient was qualified to off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and left ventricular aneurysm resection (LVAn). On the beating heart with the use of Octopus II stabilizer distal (side to side) anastomosis was performed to marginal branch and (end to side) to circumflex as a jump graft. Subsequently left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending branch anastomosis was performed. And then, on the beating heart on the two Teflon pads entry of aneurysm was closed by the mattress sutures. Next the aneurysm was resected and closed with additional continuous suture. There were non operative and post-operative complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".