MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Phase II Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Feasibility of 20[percnt] Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbation - Interim Analysis of Efficacy (P3.176)

2016· article· en· W2400329602 on OpenAlexaff
Zaeem A. Siddiqi, Ashley Mallon, Derrick Blackmore

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyasthenia gravisExacerbationInterim analysisMedicineInterimClinical trialAdverse effectInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: A preliminary analysis of efficacy of 20[percnt] Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) Hizentra@) in an ongoing study on patients with worsening myasthenia gravis (MG). BACKGROUND: Recent studies in immune-mediated neuromuscular diseases indicate that SCIg may be an effective alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Patients on chronic IVIg switched to SCIg without any loss of efficacy and reported improved quality of life due to flexibility of their treatment schedule with SCIg. No prior studies have explored the efficacy of SCIg in MG. METHODS: This is an ongoing investigator-initiated, open label, multicenter, pilot study to assess the efficacy of SCIg in patients with moderately severe MG (MGFA Class II & III). Patients received 2gm/kg of SCIg in a flexible dosing regimen over four weeks. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was change in Quantitative MG (QMG) Scores from baseline to six weeks. Secondary measures included change in QMG Composite (QMGC), Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) and MG activities of daily living (MG ADL) scores. RESULTS: To date 13 patients have been screened with 10 deemed eligible and eight enrolled (5 males & 3 females; mean age 58 years, 6 seropositive, 2 seronegative). One patient was unable to infuse SCIG due to hand weakness and another withdrew consent. Most patients showed improvement in QMG scores (mean 19 vs 13; p<.05) from baseline as well as in secondary outcome measures (mean QMGC 19 vs 8; mean MMT 15 vs. 7; mean MG ADL 7 vs. 5). In general, peak improvement occurred during the third week of treatment. Mild and transient worsening occurred in one patient initially. CONCLUSIONS: Interim analysis suggests that SCIg may be effective in patients with MG exacerbation. This is an ongoing study and further data will be needed to corroborate these preliminary findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaFrench-language works237,207