MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2401061031

Results of the first onrab® safety and immunogenicity field trial in raccoons in the u.s.

2012· article· pt· W2401061031 on OpenAlex
Richard B. Chipman, Kurt C. VerCauteren, Kathleen M. Nelson, Timothy P. Algeo, Dennis Slate

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Educação Continuada em Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia do CRMV-SP · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRabiesImmunogenicityPopulationRabies virusRabies vaccineVeterinary medicineVirologyBiologyMedicineAntibodyImmunology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A safety and immunogenicity field trial to evaluate a live recombinant human adenovirus (serotype 5)-rabies glycoprotein vaccine (ONRAB®) in raccoons and skunks was conducted in the U.S. in 2011. Approximately 80,000 Ultralite baits (Artemis Technologies, Guelph, ON, CAN) were distributed at 75 baits/km2 along 750m flight lines in 4, 127 km2 study areas in southeastern West Virginia, U.S. The bait was composed of a small blister pack that contained the ONRAB® vaccine with a waxy coating matrix of attractants impregnated with tetracycline biomarker, and camouflaged by a green dye. No phone calls from human or pet bait contacts were reported through a toll-free phone number provided on each bait. Low human population density may largely account for no reported bait contacts. No tissue abnormalities were observed in captive cottontail rabbits, opossums, fox squirrels, eastern wild turkeys, and woodrats at a 10x ONRAB® dose, and field histopathology results should be available in December 2012. Rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) was higher among raccoons (P<0.05) in post-ONRAB® samples (49.4%, n=296) than in naive pre-ORV samples (9.6%, n=395). Biomarker was higher (P<0.05), among post-ONRAB® raccoons sampled, an indication of vaccine-induced RVNA’s. The 49.4% RVNA population level in raccoons is the highest observed in the U.S. for a first time oral rabies vaccine distribution event. Skunk sample size was inadequate to assess ONRAB® effects. Field trial results warranted replication and expansion in 2012 to assess raccoon population immunity from a second ONRAB® trial in four more states, including Ohio urbansuburban habitats. These collaborative trials, which will continue to bring together multiple disciplines from county, state, federal and international jurisdictions in the spirit of One Health, should provide a basis to determine if ONRAB® is suited to achieve raccoon rabies management goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it