MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2401067508 · doi:10.1177/107110070202300408

Patellar Tendon-Bearing, Patten-Bottom Caliper Suspension Orthosis in Active Charcot Arthropathy: Crutch-Free Ambulation with No Weight Bearing in the Foot

2002· article· en· W2401067508 on OpenAlexaff
Elly Trepman, Patrick Donnelly

Bibliographic record

VenueFoot & Ankle International · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWeight-bearingAnkleSurgeryFoot (prosody)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A custom, patellar-tendon bearing (PTB), patten-bottom, caliper suspension orthosis was constructed for six patients with severe, active (Eichenholtz stage I) Charcot arthropathy of the ankle and hindfoot. With the orthosis, the suspended foot and ankle remained completely non-weight-bearing, and the lower extremity supported full weight bearing along the posterior and anterior leg shells and PTB crest. Four of the six patients used the orthosis to ambulate without crutches, leaving the upper extremities free for functional use. Frequent adjustment of the orthosis and skin examination were required. Minor problems with the orthosis included superficial skin breakdown and downward pistoning of the leg associated with improper, loose donning. Patient compliance was poor in four of the six patients because of general debility, difficulty with balance, and discomfort. However, in the other two patients, the absence of mechanical forces on the foot and ankle in the orthosis allowed the swelling and erythema of the active phase of Charcot arthropathy to resolve within several weeks, with maintenance of functional ambulation during the months required for healing of the Charcot process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoot & Ankle InternationalSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207