MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2401109717 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-367-4:033

Expression, Purification, and Detection of Novel Streptococcal Superantigens

2003· article· en· W2401109717 on OpenAlexaff
John K. McCormick, Patrick M. Schlievert

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteU.S. Public Health ServiceNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSuperantigenToxic shock syndromeMicrobiologyBiologyEnterotoxinStreptococcus pyogenesToxinAntigenVirulenceStaphylococcus aureusT-cell receptorImmune systemImmunologyT cellBacteriaGeneGeneticsEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superantigens (SAgs) are a class of bacterial or viral proteins that aberrantly alter immune system function through simultaneous interaction with lateral surfaces of major histocompatibility (MHC) class II molecules on antigen presenting cells, and to particular variable regions of the T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) β-chain. Among the secreted virulence factors from group A streptococci are the streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins (SPEs), also commonly known as erythrogenic toxins or scarlet fever toxins. Together with the enterotoxins and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) from Staphylococcus aureus, the SPEs belong to a larger family of related exotoxins collectively known as the “pyrogenic toxin” class of superantigens, which share functional activities, similar amino acid sequences, and conserved three-dimensional structures (1,2). Due to their notable association with scarlet fever and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS), SPE A (3,4) and SPE C (5) are generally considered to be the prototypical streptococcal superantigens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207