MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2401249812 · doi:10.1002/lno.10306

Benthic nitrogen regeneration, fixation, and denitrification in a temperate, eutrophic lake: Effects on the nitrogen budget and cyanobacteria blooms

2016· article· en· W2401249812 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark J. McCarthy, Wayne S. Gardner, Moritz F. Lehmann, Alexandre Guindon, David F. Bird

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersCenter for Sponsored Coastal Ocean ResearchNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsDenitrificationEutrophicationWater columnBenthic zoneEnvironmental scienceAnammoxHypoxia (environmental)Nitrogen cycleSink (geography)OceanographyHydrology (agriculture)Environmental chemistryEcologyNitrogenChemistryNutrientBiologyDenitrifying bacteriaGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nitrogen (N) transformations and fluxes at the sediment‐water interface (SWI) were measured in Missisquoi Bay, Lake Champlain, to clarify the role of N in cyanobacterial blooms in temperate, eutrophic lakes. N sources (e.g., N fixation and tributary inputs), sinks (e.g., denitrification/anammox), and internal “links” (e.g., dissimilatory reduction to ; DNRA) were evaluated at a river discharge (PRM) and in the central basin (MB). Sediments were a more effective sink at PRM than MB. Sediments at both sites were a net source to the water column, but DNRA was not a consistent regeneration pathway. Net N 2 production at PRM in summer reversed to net N 2 consumption/fixation in fall. MB sediments produced N 2 at lower rates than PRM; these rates also reversed late in the season. Denitrification was limited by , especially at MB, and anammox may have contributed up to 10% of total N 2 production. Sediment N 2 fixation occurred simultaneously with denitrification throughout the ice‐free season and, on average, compensated 25–30% of total microbial N losses. A bottom‐water hypoxia event at MB in early July 2009 altered the N cycle, with lower actual denitrification rates and higher effluxes (not from DNRA), while phosphorus (P) flux was unaffected. The hypoxia‐altered N transformation pathways enhanced N bioavailability (but not P) and may have contributed to a non‐N‐fixing cyanobacterial bloom ( Microcystis ) observed 5 d later. A preliminary N budget incorporating sediment and water column sources and sinks and external loads suggested an ecosystem‐wide N deficit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and OceanographySame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207