Dual Growing Rods Technique for Congenital Scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of dual growing rod (GR) technique in treating children with congenital scoliosis (CS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Published reports on the dual GR technique results of early-onset scoliosis demonstrate it to be safe and effective. However, the use of GR in congenital spinal deformities is controversial, and there have been no reports on the results and complications of dual GR technique for CS with large series of patients. METHODS: During 2004 to 2009, a total of 30 patients with CS underwent dual GR procedures. Of the 159 total procedures conducted within the treatment period, 125 were lengthenings with an average of 4.2 lengthenings per patient. Five patients with severe rigid deformity or kyphosis had an osteotomy at apex vertebra with short segmental fusion. The analysis included age at initial surgery and final fusion (if applicable), number and frequency of lengthenings, and complications. Radiographical evaluation was conducted. RESULTS: The mean scoliosis improved from 72.3° to 34.9° after initial surgery and was 35.2° at the last follow-up or after final fusion. T1-S1 length increased from 25.42 to 29.03 cm after initial surgery and to 33.32 cm at last follow-up or after final fusion with an average T1-S1 length increase of 1.49 cm per year. The space available for lung ratio in patients with thoracic curves improved from 0.84 to 0.96 at the latest follow-up. Three patients reached final fusion. Complications occurred in 7 of the 30 patients, and they had a total of 13 complications. CONCLUSION: The dual GR technique is safe and effective in the treatment of selected cases of long, complex CS. It maintains correction achieved at initial surgery while allowing spinal growth to continue. And it has an acceptable rate of complications. The osteotomy at the apex vertebra with short segmental fusion of the severe rigid scoliosis or the patients with kyphosis could help to improve the correction and decrease the implant failures, with little influence on the length of the spine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".