MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2402204697

Lower Bounds on Interactive Compressibility by Constant-Depth Circuits.

2012· article· en· W2402204697 on OpenAlexaff
Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Rahul Santhanam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpper and lower boundsMathematicsConnection (principal bundle)Constant (computer programming)CompressibilityBounded functionElectronic circuitCompression (physics)Discrete mathematicsCombinatoricsOmegaProbabilistic logicComputer scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryQuantum mechanicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We formulate a new connection between instance compressibility [HN10]), where the compressor uses circuits from a class C, and correlation with circuits in C. We use this connection to prove the first lower bounds on general probabilistic multi-round instance compression. We show that there is no probabilistic multi-round compression protocol for Parity in which the computationally bounded party uses a non-uniform AC 0-circuit and transmits at most n/(log(n)) ω(1) bits. This result is tight, and strengthens results of Dubrov and Ishai [DI06]. We also show that a similar lower bound holds for Majority. We also consider the question of round separation, i.e., whether for each r � 1, there are functions which can be compressed better with r rounds of compression than with r − 1 rounds. We answer this question affirmatively for compression using constant-depth polynomial-size circuits. Finally, we prove the first non-trivial lower bounds for 1-round compressibility of Parity by polynomial size ACC 0 [p] circuits where p is an odd prime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.024
Open science0.0060.010
Research integrity0.0040.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsFrench-language works237,207