MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2402306139

IMPLANTABLE MICRO-MACHINED CAPACITIVE SENSOR TO MONITOR COMPARTMENT PRESSURES IN LOWER LIMB

2018· article· en· W2402306139 on OpenAlexaff
Saad Al-Qahtani, Edward J. Harvey, Janet E. Henderson, Vamsy P. Chodavarapu, Yongjie Wang, Charles Allan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPressure sensorTourniquetCompartment (ship)Biomedical engineeringCapacitive sensingPosterior compartment of thighThighPressure measurementMaterials scienceMedicineSurgeryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) occurs after muscle injury and is characterised by increased pressure in the muscle compartment that can result in devastating complications if not diagnosed and treated appropriately. ACS is currently confirmed by repeated needle sticks to measure the compartment pressure using a hand-held compartment pressure monitor. This approach is often not reproducible and is not appropriate for continuous monitoring. To address the shortcomings of currently available technology we are developing an implantable micro-device that will measure compartment pressure directly and continuously over the 24 hours critical period following injury using a radio frequency identification (RFID) platform integrated with a MEMS capacitive pressure sensor. Methods The prototype implantable device measuring 3mmx3mm consists of a capacitive pressure sensor, a sensor readout circuitry, an antenna and a radio frequency reader. A prototype sensor was packaged in Silicone gel (MED-6640, Nusil Technology LLC) for ex vivo and in vivo testing in three compartment models. First, it was tested ex vivo in an airtight vessel using a blood pressure monitor to pump air and increase the pressure inside the vessel. Second, it was implanted in a muscle compartment of a fresh porcine hind limb and an infusion pump with normal saline was used to raise the tissue pressure. Third, it was implanted in the posterior thigh muscle of a rat where the pressure was increased by applying a tourniquet around the thigh. The readings were compared with those from a hand-held Stryker Intra-compartmental Pressure Monitor System used in the trauma room. Results The sensor reading from the radio frequency reader software interface in all three models showed good linearity against the pressure applied to the compartment. Conclusion The successful completion of this project will lead to the development of an implantable miniaturised wireless pressure sensor microsystem capable of measuring tissue compartment pressures in the critical period after traumatic injury and reduce the incidence of serious complications such as severe pain, paralysis, sensory deficits, muscle necrosis and permanent disability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→