MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 2006: Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Hyperacute Phase of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Predicts Late Myocardial Recovery

2008· article· en· W2402319689 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Larose, Josep Rodés, Can M. Nguyen, Guy Proulx, Onil Gleeton, Jean‐Pierre Déry, Bernard Noël, Gérald Barbeau, Louis Roy, Marc Amyot, Robert DeLarochellière, Olivier F. Bertrand

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineEjection fractionMyocardial infarctionStroke volumePerfusionHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) late after myocardial infarction determines whether patients will benefit from cardioverter/defibrillator (CV/D) implantation. At present, patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are evaluated several months later to determine EF and CV/D indication following initial recovery. We determined whether contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) in the hyperacute phase of STEMI could predict late myocardial recovery. 50 patients with STEMI underwent CE-CMR within 12 hours of primary angioplasty (median 4h). All had follow-up CE-CMR >6 months later. Global and segmental left ventricular function, morphology, perfusion and necrosis were determined and assessed by validated techniques (QMass, Medis, the Netherlands). In the hyperacute phase of STEMI, a greater cardiac output (4.2 vs 3.4 L/min, p=0.01) was measured due to significantly greater heart rate (72 vs 57 bpm, p<0.01) despite similar stroke volumes (59 vs 60mL, p=NS) compared to >6 months later. On average, LVEF did not significantly change from hyperacute STEMI to recovered phase (51 vs 54%, p=NS) but systolic wall thickening increased on average from 41 to 50% (p=0.01) due to compensatory increased systolic thickening of non-infarct related segments. LV mass decreased from 120 to 105 g (p=0.01) due to a decrease in mean wall thickness driven by infarct segment wall thinning (9.2 vs 8.4mm, p<0.01). Microvascular function improved significantly (time to 50% enhancement on first-pass CE-MRI: 24.3 vs 21.7ms, p=0.03). Contrary to prior reports of “scar shrinkage” comparing necrosis in the first week after STEMI and 6 months later, necrosis relative to total myocardial volume did not differ between the hyperacute phase and >6 months (20 vs 18%, p=0.46). Furthermore, the transmural extent of necrosis, a potent predictor of functional recovery, did not significantly change from the hyperacute to the recovered phase of STEMI (mean 17 vs 14%, p=0.38). CE-MRI in the hyperacute phase of STEMI is a powerful predictor of long-term myocardial function and necrosis which could prove useful for very early risk stratification and future targeting of appropriate therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→