Evoluția Conjuncturii Economiei Mondiale (The Evolution of World Economy Outlook)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Romanian Abstract: In 2013, economia mondiala și-a continuat evoluția modesta din ultimii ani, situându-se cu peste 1 p.p. sub media perioadei 2000-2007 și cu 0,75 p.p. sub cea a ultimilor 15 ani dinaintea crizei financiare.Din grupul statelor dezvoltate cele mai rapide ritmuri de creștere s-au inregistrat in Statele Unite (2,2%), Canada (2,0%), Marea Britanie (1,7%) și Japonia (1,6%). Experții OCDE prognozeaza o imbunatațire moderata a creșterii economiei mondiale in urmatorii doi ani, marcata de evoluții divergente intre principalele economii ale lumii, insoțite de riscuri și vulnerabilitați semnificative.English Abstract: In 2013, the global economy has continued the modest growth of recent years, with 1 percentage point below the 2000-2007 period and about 0,75 percentage point below the average of the 15 years prior to financial crisis.Within advanced economies group, growth was stronger in the United States (2,2%), Canada (2,0%), the United Kingdom (1,7%) and Japan (1,6%). OECD Report forecasts a moderate improvement in global growth over the next two years, marked with divergence across the major economies and large risks and vulnerabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".