MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Business-To-Business Ecommerce Of Information Systems: Two Cases Of Asp-To-Sme Erental

2002· article· en· W2402530292 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tsipi Heart, Nava Pliskin

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApplication service providerBusinessThe InternetProduct (mathematics)HospitalityService (business)MarketingService providerTourismComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enterprises today can “eRent” Information Systems (ISs), through the Internet, from Application Service Providers (ASPs). This emerging IS “eRental” concept is a special case of Business-to-Business eCommerce, where the product is an IS application and the business units engaged in commerce are an enterprise and an ASP. For small or medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), IS eRental might be an appealing solution to complex and costly IT acquisition and implementation. It is yet too early to assess what the future holds for ASP and how far-reaching ASP implications could be for IS delivery and management in the future economy. It is possible however, to focus on and learn from ASP case studies. This paper briefly describes Net-POS and Silverbyte, two Israeli software vendors for the hospitality industry whose members, mostly SMEs, confront with great difficulty the high cost of owning, maintaining, and managing the state-of-the-art IS infrastructure required in the Internet era. These vendors have recently entered the ASP arena by adding an IS eRental option to their for-sale IS offerings. The case studies are followed by a discussion of the new ASP concept as well as of possible directions for research on ASP-to-SME eRental.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.015
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207