MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2402943055

[Assessment of an educational program in an "Atopic School": pilot study in 40 patients].

2002· article· en· W2402943055 on OpenAlexaff
J.-M. Chavigny, F Adiceom, C. Bernier, M. Debons, J.F. Stalder

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtopic dermatitisSCORADMedicineEducational programQuality of life (healthcare)DiseaseFamily medicinePhysical therapyDermatologyDermatology Life Quality IndexInternal medicineNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of the educational management of 40 moderate to severe atopic patients was performed in the atopic dermatitis school created in Nantes (France) from November 2000 to May 2001. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (SCORAD >20) were selected according to the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka and included in an open pilot study including a specific educational program. Atopic training included consultations, demonstrations, interviews with both dermatologist and nurses and workshops organized in three subgroups according to the age of the patients. SCORAD index, educational diagnosis and at least one educational objective were established during the first consultation. Evaluation criteria were defined in accordance with the educational objectives. Specific educational tools were used for each objective. RESULTS: Forty patients (mean age: 9 years) were followed during 6 months. At the beginning of the study the mean SCORAD was of 50.5. After a 6 months follow-up, the mean SCORAD was of 22 and improvement of the SCORAD was noted in 97 p. 100 of cases. Educational objectives were reached in 70.6 p. 100 of cases. One patient lost contact. DISCUSSION: The educational approach of atopic dermatitis includes global assessment of the disease after identification of risk factors, disrupted quality of life, skin-damaging behavior, family stress. Educational diagnosis focusing on local treatment is a major step; topical treatment is either misunderstood or conducted erroneously or non-existent. Therapeutic education plays a key role in the compliance and efficacy of treatment. Pain management, demonstration and explanation of skin care by health care professionals, information on the disease in age-specific workshops provided good results in more than 70 p. 100 of cases. Severe atopic dermatitis in children can lead to major domestic conflicts when the parents are in charge of the treatment. Giving responsibilities to the children, by teaching them how to treat themselves, relieves the parents from their involvement and finally reduces the conflicts. CONCLUSION: The difficulties encountered in treating refractory atopic dermatitis may be secondary to the severity of the disease, to poor compliance or to the extent of the psychological impact. Therapeutic education of the patient, as performed in the atopic dermatitis school, represents a major breakthrough in the care of such patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207