Increased AT(2)R protein expression but not increased apoptosis during cardioprotection induced by AT(1)R blockade.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) is considered to be antigrowth and to mediate apoptosis in several cell types. Whether AT2R upregulation, associated with angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockade and cardioprotection after ischemia-reperfusion (IR), might not result in increased cardiomyocyte (CM) apoptosis has not been documented. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether increased AT2R protein expression, during AT1R blockade after acute IR, is associated with no increase in CM apoptosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recovery of left ventricular (LV) mechanical function after acute IR (30 min of ischemia, 40 min of reperfusion) was measured in isolated Langendorff rat hearts following pretreatment with the AT1R antagonist candesartan (CN) (CN 10 nmol/L) for 40 min before ischemia. The authors established with an initial dose-response curve using escalating concentrations of CN that 10 nmol/L abrogated vasoconstriction induced by angiotensin II (0.1 mmol/L). AT1R and AT2R protein expression (Western immunoblot), CM apoptosis (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated 2'-deoxyuridine 5'-triphosphate nick end-labelling assay and nuclear morphology) and apoptotic markers (Bax, Bcl-2, caspase-3, p53) were assessed in LV tissue. RESULTS: Compared with IR controls, CN improved peak systolic pressure, LV developed pressure and positive dp/dt, and increased AT2R (not AT1R) protein, but did not change the level of apoptosis or the expression of Bax, Bcl-2, caspase-3 or p53. CN also increased AT2R protein after ischemia alone but did not change CM apoptosis or expression of the markers. CONCLUSIONS: Increased AT2R protein expression during AT1R blockade after IR in the isolated Langendorff rat heart is associated with cardioprotection but no increase in CM apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".