MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403098558

Cognitive changes after unilateral cortico-amygdalohippocampectomy unilateral selective-amygdalohippocampectomy mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

2007· article· en· W2403098558 on OpenAlexaff
Taner Tanrıverdi, André Olivier

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampal sclerosisMedicineMesial temporal lobe epilepsyVerbal memoryNeuropsychologyEpilepsyTemporal lobeEpilepsy surgeryNeuropsychological assessmentAnesthesiaRefractory (planetary science)SurgeryCognitionPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare neuropsychological outcome at 1-year follow-up in patients with medically refractory unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) due to hippocampal sclerosis (HS) treated by a cortico-amygdalohippocampectomy (CAH) or a selective-amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH). METHODS: Data for a series of 72 adult patients who underwent surgery for MTLE/HS were evaluated. Thirty-six patients underwent CAH and 36 SAH. All patients underwent neuropsychological evaluation before and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The intelligence quotient increased postoperatively in both surgical groups. Memory evaluation in the CAH group revealed a postoperative decline in nonverbal memory after right-sided resection and a postoperative decline in verbal memory after left-sided resection. In the SAH group, there was a slight postoperative decline only in verbal memory after left-sided resection, but other memory function was well preserved. However, no significant difference was found between two approaches regarding memory. There was no also statistically significant difference between two approaches in terms of seizure outcome at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in the clinical planning of seizure treatment, the optimal type of surgical approach is dependent on the outcome predictions, rather than on any supposed advantages to postoperative memory function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207