The pharmacokinetics of dronedarone in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of the current study were to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of dronedarone in the rat, and to examine the effect of hyperlipidemia on its pharmacokinetics. Single doses of dronedarone were administered to rats intravenously (4 mg/kg), orally (55 mg/kg) and intraperitoneally (65 mg/kg). To induce hyperlipidemia, some of the rats were administered intraperitoneal doses of poloxamer 407 before giving an oral dose of dronedarone. After intravenous doses of 4 mg/kg dronedarone, plasma clearance and volume of distribution at steady-state were 25.1 ± 8.09 mL/min/kg and 10.8 ± 4.77 L/kg, respectively. After oral doses the maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and their median time of attainment (tmax) were 1.87 ± 1.65 mg/mL and 3.5 h, respectively. Intraperitoneal administration of 65 mg/kg dronedarone base yielded plasma Cmax and median tmax of 0.816 ± 0.611 mg/mL and 3 h, respectively. Protein binding was high in NL and HL plasma. Dronedarone is extensively distributed with high volume of distribution in the rat. The drug showed poor bioavailability (<20%) after oral and intraperitoneal administration. The increased plasma concentrations after oral dosing to hyperlipidemic rats appears to be attributable to a direct effect on metabolizing enzymes or transport proteins. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".