MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403420330 · doi:10.1002/acr.22938

Disease Outcomes in Glucocorticosteroid‐Naive Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

2016· article· en· W2403420330 on OpenAlexaffabout
Barry J. Sheane, Dafna D. Gladman, Jiandong Su, Murray B. Urowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis Care & Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSystemic lupus erythematosusInternal medicineSystemic diseaseCohortOsteoporosisLupus erythematosusConnective tissue diseaseDiseaseCoronary artery diseaseImmunologyAutoimmune disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The phenotype of patients who remain naive of glucocorticosteroids has not been described, and the type and rate of their damage accrual remains largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare the type, amount, rate, and nature of organ damage accrual, mortality, and atherosclerotic comorbidities in glucocorticosteroid-naive and glucocorticosteroid-exposed patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Inception patients from the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic who had never taken glucocorticosteroids and had a minimum of 3 years of followup were compared to patients who received glucocorticosteroids within the first 6 months of SLE diagnosis and for at least 3 years. All patients had no damage at inception. RESULTS: A total of 86 glucocorticosteroid-naive and 173 glucocorticosteroid-exposed patients were included. There were more females and whites among the glucocorticosteroid-naive patients, whereas the glucocorticosteroid-exposed patients had higher Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 scores on first examination. Overall mortality was higher in the glucocorticosteroid-exposed group, but the deaths occurred late. There was no difference in the frequency of coronary artery disease overall or at each of the time points. Damage accrual was higher in glucocorticosteroid-exposed patients overall and at 5 and 8 years. Individual damage items that were higher in glucocorticosteroid-exposed patients included ocular (cataracts) and musculoskeletal (osteoporosis with fragility fractures, and osteonecrosis) components. CONCLUSION: Mortality is more frequent in patients taking glucocorticosteroids for at least the first 3 years of their lupus compared to patients who are glucocorticosteroid-naive. In addition, patients taking glucocorticosteroids accumulate more damage by 5 years of disease, and damage tends to be glucocorticosteroid related, including cataracts and musculoskeletal components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthritis Care & ResearchSame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207