MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2403443153 · doi:10.5588/ijtld.10.0719

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses [State of the art series. Operational research. Number 5 in the series]

2011· article· en· W2403443153 on OpenAlexaff
Dick Menzies

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrey literatureProtocol (science)Systematic reviewPoolingMedicineGuidelineSelection (genetic algorithm)MEDLINEPopulationComputer scienceData scienceManagement scienceAlternative medicineArtificial intelligencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.101
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.330
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1010.330
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.013
Bibliometrics0.0610.056
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.013
Open science0.0080.007
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1110.075

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.725
GPT teacher head0.546
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease→Same topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews→French-language works237,207→