MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403638562 · doi:10.14288/1.0072462

Health promoting elementary schools in British Columbia : an analysis of school websites

2011· article· en· W2403638562 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melissa Jacobs

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedagogySociologyMathematics educationPolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to explore the Comprehensive School Health approach and its influence on a school's culture of health. In this study, school websites were analyzed for healthy school words, sentences, and placement of content to determine how well three schools in British Columbia are making use of technology for the purpose of sharing attributes of Health Promoting Schools within their school communities. The schools chosen were categorized by the number of years they had been members of the Healthy Schools Network of British Columbia and were located in communities rated “low” and “lowest” vulnerable in the section of Physical Health and Well-Being of the Early Development Instrument. The study was divided into four phases: 1) A pilot study was executed which resulted in a tool for the quantitative analysis; 2) An in-depth qualitative and quantitative content analysis of provincial school websites was conducted classifying healthy school terms into the four pillars of the Comprehensive School Health framework; 3) A thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted formulating fifteen themes; and 4) A final analysis was performed which examined the locations or communication trends of healthy schools terms on the websites. Results from the analyses revealed that the health content terms were focused mostly in the Comprehensive School Health categories of Teaching and Learning (26%) and Social and Physical Environment (37%) while 50% of the healthy schools terms were found to be located in school newsletters. This study found that schools did not utilize their websites to support the teaching and learning of the British Columbia Ministry of Education Healthy Living and Physical Education curriculum. Also missing from school websites were Healthy Schools Policy documents and information on teacher wellness. A Comprehensive School Health conceptual framework of attributes of Health Promoting Schools was created from the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0090.017
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207