Germination of leafy spurge (<i>Euphorbia esula</i> L.) seeds under alternating temperatures: the effects of amplitude, midpoint, and imbibition in gibberellic acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Germinability of dormant seeds or the capacity to germinate under particular conditions is sometimes enhanced by a diurnal alternating temperature regime relative to a constant temperature. Alternating temperature regimes vary in amplitude (difference between the minimum and maximum) and midpoint (average). The aim of this research was to test the effects of amplitude and midpoint regimes on germination of dormant leafy spurge seed from a Fargo, ND population in water and gibberellic acid (GA3). The optimal regimes for germination in both water and GA3 were 20:30 °C (16 h:8 h) and 20:35 °C (19 h:5 h), which provided amplitudes of 10 °C and 15 °C, respectively, with both conditions having a midpoint temperature of 23.3 °C. However, midpoint temperature of 22 °C to 27 °C were equally effective for germination under the 20:30 °C and 20:35 °C alternating temperature regimes. Additional alternating temperature regimes with amplitudes of 15 °C (15:30 °C and 10:25 °C), 20 °C (10:30 °C), and 25 °C (10:35 °C) generally displayed reduced germination in both water and GA3, which is likely attributable to the low initial alternating temperature (≤15 °C) component of the regime relative to the higher initial temperature of 20 °C for the optimum regimes of 20:30 °C and 20:35 °C. Under the alternating temperature regimes tested, seeds germinated in GA3 generally displayed higher germination (≥80%) compared with seeds in water (30%–50%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".