MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403845687 · doi:10.1007/978-1-61737-988-8_24

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Genetic Transformation of Cereals Using Immature Embryos

2010· article· en· W2403845687 on OpenAlexaff
Ashok K. Shrawat, Allen G. Good

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacteriumTransformation (genetics)BiologyCallusCropCultivarEmbryoBotanyHorticultureCell biologyAgronomyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A critical step in the development of a robust Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation -system for cereal crop plants is the establishment of optimal conditions for efficient T-DNA delivery into target tissue, from which plants can be regenerated. Although, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cereals is an important method that has been widely used by many laboratories around the world, routine protocols have been established only in specific cultivars within a species and with specific tissues of high regeneration potential. Cocultivation of highly embryogenic callus tissue or healthy immature embryos with A. tumefaciens is considered one of the critical factors in successful genetic transformation of crop plants. Immature embryos collected only from vigorously growing healthy and green plants grown in the field or in the well-conditioned greenhouse are the ideal target for genetic transformation of recalcitrant crop species. Here, we describe an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method that uses immature embryos as the starting material for inoculation with Agrobacterium. The aim of this chapter is to provide the key steps/components involved in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cereal crops. However, these steps or components often vary between protocols and from laboratory to laboratory, and can be optimized or modified based on the requirement of a specific cultivar or species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207