MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2404198374

Superiorly based pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency: intermediate and longer-term perceptual speech and nasometric outcomes.

2011· article· en· W2404198374 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shahin Nabi, Susan Tan, Murad Husein, Anne Dworschak‐Stokan, Y Bureau, Damir B. Matic

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCleft Lip and Palate Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Western OntarioLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharyngeal flapVelopharyngeal insufficiencyCraniofacialSurgerySwallowingAudiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intermediate and longer-term perceptual and objective speech outcomes in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) patients treated with a superiorly based pharyngeal flap. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care centre, London, Ontario. METHODS: Forty consecutive VPI patients (mean age 14.5 years) from 2004 to 2008 who had a first time superiorly based pharyngeal flap were included. The modified Hogan flap and lateral port control technique was used with a 70° endoscope to provide intraoperative coaxial and magnified lateral port visualization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) perceptual speech assessment and nasalance measured via nasometry using the MacKay-Kummer Simplified Nasometric Assessment Procedures Revised (SNAP-R). A comparison of mean outcomes from the pretreatment versus an intermediate (ACPA 4.3 months; SNAP-R 4.0 months) and longer-term (ACPA 19.5 months) posttreatment time point was performed, and the distribution of successful outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Mean perceptual scores improved significantly early after surgery (p < .0001; n = 33) and in the longer term (p < .01; n = 21), with high success rates for hypernasality (87.9% and 80.9%; p < .0001), audible nasal emission (90.9% and 90.5%; p < .0001), overall intelligibility (75.7% and 81.0%; p < .01), and compensatory articulation (81.8% and 85.7%; p < .01). Likewise, significant improvements were observed in posttreatment nasal (n = 38; p < .01) and mean oral SNAP-R scores (n = 39; p < .001), which demonstrated success rates of 100% (p < .0001) and 73% (p < .0001), respectively. Overcorrection was not observed in perceptual and nasometric testing. CONCLUSION: The modified Hogan flap and lateral port control technique with the use of a 70° endoscope is highly successful in treating VPI. These results indicate that speech outcome improvement occurs early after surgery and is maintained over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCleft Lip and Palate ResearchFrench-language works237,207