Superiorly based pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency: intermediate and longer-term perceptual speech and nasometric outcomes.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intermediate and longer-term perceptual and objective speech outcomes in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) patients treated with a superiorly based pharyngeal flap. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care centre, London, Ontario. METHODS: Forty consecutive VPI patients (mean age 14.5 years) from 2004 to 2008 who had a first time superiorly based pharyngeal flap were included. The modified Hogan flap and lateral port control technique was used with a 70° endoscope to provide intraoperative coaxial and magnified lateral port visualization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) perceptual speech assessment and nasalance measured via nasometry using the MacKay-Kummer Simplified Nasometric Assessment Procedures Revised (SNAP-R). A comparison of mean outcomes from the pretreatment versus an intermediate (ACPA 4.3 months; SNAP-R 4.0 months) and longer-term (ACPA 19.5 months) posttreatment time point was performed, and the distribution of successful outcomes was assessed. RESULTS: Mean perceptual scores improved significantly early after surgery (p < .0001; n = 33) and in the longer term (p < .01; n = 21), with high success rates for hypernasality (87.9% and 80.9%; p < .0001), audible nasal emission (90.9% and 90.5%; p < .0001), overall intelligibility (75.7% and 81.0%; p < .01), and compensatory articulation (81.8% and 85.7%; p < .01). Likewise, significant improvements were observed in posttreatment nasal (n = 38; p < .01) and mean oral SNAP-R scores (n = 39; p < .001), which demonstrated success rates of 100% (p < .0001) and 73% (p < .0001), respectively. Overcorrection was not observed in perceptual and nasometric testing. CONCLUSION: The modified Hogan flap and lateral port control technique with the use of a 70° endoscope is highly successful in treating VPI. These results indicate that speech outcome improvement occurs early after surgery and is maintained over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".