MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2404522864

Free tissue transfer flap reconstruction of parotidectomy defects: outcomes analysis and the utility of three-dimensional laser surface scans.

2010· article· en· W2404522864 on OpenAlexaffabout
David W. J. Côté, Jeffrey Harris, Jennifer Guillemaud, Jason Chau, Andrew Grosvenor, Benjamin King, Hadi Seikaly

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesFree flapGynecologyMedicineSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Tumours of the parotid gland are generally managed surgically without reconstruction. The usual long-term outcomes of these techniques are facial scars, asymmetry, and permanent contour deficits. These cosmetic deformities can significantly affect patients' self-image and negatively impact their quality of life. Free tissue transfers have been used increasingly over the past years to improve patients' cosmetic and satisfaction outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cosmetic and symmetry outcomes of patients undergoing free flap reconstruction after parotid surgery. METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics review board at the University of Alberta. All patients undergoing total parotid surgery were offered a free flap tissue transfer reconstructive procedure. Seven consecutive patients undergoing the reconstruction option were included in the study. The control group was composed of seven patients who had undergone total parotid surgery without reconstruction. Data regarding demographics, surgical procedure, pathology, and postoperative complications were collected. Facial symmetry was evaluated with questionnaires and laser surface scanning. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, timing of surgery, or pathology. The reconstructed patients tended to perceive a better symmetry when compared to the nonreconstructed patients (p = .0014). The reconstructed patients had all experienced a slight volume increase on the operative side compared to the contralateral side, with a mean difference of 4.99% increase in volume. Conversely, the nonreconstructed patients all experienced a notable volume deficit on the operative side compared to the nonoperative side-an average 12.15% volume loss was seen postoperatively. This difference was statistically significant (p ≤ .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Free tissue transfer reconstruction is an effective means of reconstructing postparotidectomy defects in patients for whom facial volume asymmetry is a concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesFrench-language works237,207