MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2404633220 · doi:10.1177/0021998315615407

Flax and its thermoplastic biocomposites

2015· article· en· W2404633220 on OpenAlexaff
T-D Ngo, Mohammadreza Nofar, M-T Ton-That, Wei Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composite Materials · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaAlberta Innovates
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialPolypropyleneDifferential scanning calorimetryCompression moldingMaleic anhydrideScanning electron microscopeThermoplasticMolding (decorative)CrystallizationGlass fiberFiberPolyamidePolymerMoldChemical engineeringCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential of flax fabric in the production of ‘green’ composites based on polypropylene (PP) was evaluated. The laminate composites were prepared by compression molding of flax fabric (with and without treatment) and PP films (using different formulations of PP). The morphology and crystallization of the PP/flax composites were characterized using scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction, and differential scanning calorimetry. The mechanical performance of the composites was also evaluated. The results demonstrate that fiber treatment and PP formulation play important roles on the performance of composites. This study proved that the addition of the coupling agent maleic anhydride grafted PP to the composites improves the interfacial adhesion between hydrophilic flax fibers and the hydrophobic PP matrix and thus the mechanical properties. The combination of the coupling agent and reactive additive provides superior strength, modulus and brings further fire resistance to the PP/flax composites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composite MaterialsSame topicNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesFrench-language works237,207