MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2405097091 · doi:10.2118/180715-ms

A Proxy Model for Predicting SAGD Production from Reservoirs Containing Shale Barriers

2016· article· en· W2405097091 on OpenAlexafffund
Jingwen Zheng, Juliana Y. Leung, R. P. Sawatzky, José M. Alvarez

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsAlberta InnovatesUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta InnovatesSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsOil shalePetrophysicsPetroleum engineeringReservoir simulationPermeability (electromagnetism)GeologyTight oilRelative permeabilityOil sandsPorosityShale oilGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceAsphalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An approach based on artificial intelligence (AI) tools is being used to explore the influence of shale heterogeneities on SAGD production. In this project, the production data is derived from a set of synthetic SAGD reservoir simulations based on petrophysical properties and operational constraints representative of Athabasca oil sands reservoirs. The underlying reservoir simulation model is homogeneous, and two-dimensional. Its petrophysical properties, such as the porosity, permeability, initial oil saturation and net pay thickness, have been taken from average values for several pads in Suncor's Firebag project. Superimposed on this homogeneous reservoir model are sets of idealized shale barrier configurations. The permeability of each shale barrier is several orders of magnitude smaller than the permeability of the oil sand in the simulation model. The individual shale barriers are categorized by their location relative to the SAGD well pair (vertical and lateral), and by their geometry (thickness and lateral extent). SAGD production was simulated with the reservoir model for a training set of shale barrier configurations. The training set was chosen to try to span the space of possible shale barrier configurations in the reservoir model; the elements of the set were identified by means of experimental design. A network model based on AI tools was constructed to match the output of the reservoir simulation model for this training set of shale barrier configurations, with a focus on the production rate and the steam-oil ratio (SOR). Then the trained AI proxy model was used to predict SAGD production profiles for scenarios where the shale barriers were distributed stochastically. The results of these predictions were compared with the results of the SAGD simulation model with the same shale barrier configurations. The match to production rate and SOR was good, better than expected. The results of this work demonstrate the capability and flexibility of the AI-based network model, and of the parameterization technique for representing the characteristics of the shale barriers, in capturing the effects of complex heterogeneities on SAGD production. The approach could be extended to study the effects of other heterogeneous features such as lean zones on SAGD production. It offers the significant potential of providing an indirect method for inferring the presence and distribution of heterogeneous reservoir features from the profiles of SAGD field production data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207