Microscopic Metallic Wear and Tissue Response in Failed Titanium Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Implants: Two Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The membranes present at the implant-bone interface were retrieved from two patients with titanium single stem hallux implants that had failed. Both patients had pain and valgus deformity of the hallux, and radiographs showed a radiolucent shadow around the implant stem, with thinning of the dorsal cortex of the proximal phalanx in one patient. After removal of the implants, arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MP) joint was performed. Histologic analysis of the membrane tissue at the implant-bone interface showed a synovial-like appearance. There was a fibrous tissue stroma adjacent to the bone surface, with multiple regions of scalloping covered by mononuclear cells. Fine metallic debris was seen throughout the fibrous tissue. Multinucleated foreign body giant cells were sparsely observed associated with fine particulate metallic wear debris similar to observations from failed total hip arthroplasties. The histologic appearance is evidence that foreign-body granulomatous infiltration associated with metallic wear debris may be a causative factor of peri-implant osteolysis leading to aseptic loosening and failure of titanium single stem hallux implants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".