Pilot study on the feasibility of limited focused real‐time echocardiography during pediatric renal transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pediatric renal transplantation protocols describe supraphysiological blood pressure and CVP to optimize graft perfusion. Ideal CVP and blood pressure targets in children are uncertain and difficult to achieve and/or sustain without incurring morbidity. We correlated intra-operative ECHO with standard monitoring to assess intravascular volume at critical intra-operative stages. A feasibility pilot study of real-time limited ECHO images during four critical stages of pediatric renal transplantation (baseline; venous and arterial clamps on; clamps off; 5-10 min post-clamp release) was conducted. Simultaneous CVP, SBP and DBP measurements were obtained with ECHO images. A surgeon blinded to the ECHO study assessed the quality of graft perfusion. Thirteen patients (nine TTE and four TEE) were enrolled. The CI increased in all patients at vascular clamp removal and the post-resuscitation period (average increase in CI 20%, range 8-49%). SBP, DBP and CVP were inconsistent. ECHO data confirmed an appropriate CI increase even when the targeted CVP and BP values described in protocols were not achieved. The surgeons were satisfied with graft perfusion in 12 of 13 cases, with one locally obstructed vessel. We suggested that aiming for fixed targets in CVP and BP is not necessary to augment CI and encourage good renal perfusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".