MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review: Borderland Films: American Cinema, Mexico and Canada during the Progressive Era by Dominique Brégent-Heald

2016· article· en· W2405248142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Colin Gunckel

Bibliographic record

VenueSouthern California Quarterly · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconMovie theaterArt historyHistoryCitationAmerican historyAmerican studiesMedia studiesArtLibrary scienceHumanitiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| May 01 2016 Review: Borderland Films: American Cinema, Mexico and Canada during the Progressive Era by Dominique Brégent-Heald Borderland Films: American Cinema, Mexico and Canada during the Progressive Era. By Dominique Brégent-Heald. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2015. 448 pp. $60.00 hardcover.) Colin Gunckel Colin Gunckel Colin Gunckel is an assistant professor of screen arts and cultures, American culture and Latina/o studies at the University of Michigan and the author of Mexico on Main Street: Transnational Film Culture in Los Angeles before World War II (Rutgers University Press, 2015). He has published essays in a number of scholarly journals, including American Quarterly, Aztlán: A Journal of Chicano Studies, Film History, and Velvet Light Trap. He also serves as Associate Editor of the A Ver: Revisioning Art History monograph series on individual Latino/a artists. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Southern California Quarterly (2016) 98 (2): 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1525/ucpsocal.2016.98.2.239 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Colin Gunckel; Review: Borderland Films: American Cinema, Mexico and Canada during the Progressive Era by Dominique Brégent-Heald. Southern California Quarterly 1 May 2016; 98 (2): 239–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ucpsocal.2016.98.2.239 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentSouthern California Quarterly Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2016 by The Historical Society of Southern California2016 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouthern California QuarterlySame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207