MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2405554099

Cost effectiveness in Canada of eptifibatide treatment for acute coronary syndrome patients using PURSUIT subgroup analysis.

2003· article· en· W2405554099 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruth E. Brown, Paul W. Armstrong

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEptifibatideMedicineAcute coronary syndromePlaceboUnstable anginaIntensive care medicineInternal medicineEmergency medicinePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarctionAlternative medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of eptifibatide, a new glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Canada. DESIGN: A model was created to analyze the cost effectiveness of eptifibatide using outcomes and resource utilization data from the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial, an international, placebo controlled, randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy of eptifibatide in treating ACS. Cost data were derived from Canadian sources. Clinical outcomes were derived from published survival analyses based on North American PURSUIT data. SETTING: The present analysis is representative of the Canadian health care setting. Data for resource use reflected actual resources used by patients in the Canadian arm of the PURSUIT study. PATIENTS: Patients included in the PURSUIT study were hospitalized for non-ST segment elevation ACS between November 1995 and January 1997. INTERVENTIONS: Eptifibatide or placebo treatment was randomly assigned in addition to standard treatment with acetylsalicylic acid and heparin. MAIN RESULTS: Per patient costs for hospitalization, medical procedures and medications associated with standard treatment plus placebo were 10,265 dollars compared with 10,691 dollars with eptifibatide, in 1995 Canadian dollars. Eptifibatide patients had lower rehospitalization rates in the six months following treatment. Discounting future health outcomes by 3%, the cost effectiveness of treating ACS patients with eptifibatide in Canada was estimated as 5,165 dollars per year of life gained. CONCLUSIONS: Considering both the cost of eptifibatide therapy over standard treatment and the health benefits associated with it, eptifibatide is a cost effective, economically attractive pharmacological option for the treatment of ACS patients in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207