The effects of circulating antigen on the pharmacokinetics and radioimmunoscintigraphic properties of 99m Tc labelled monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: PURPOSE. This article reports the pharmacokinetics, radiation dosimetry and radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) of two (99m)Tc-labelled monoclonal antibodies (MAb) used to detect cancer. METHODS: The effects of circulating antigen in female cancer patients are explored and their effects on the ability of these MAbs to effectively perform as RIS agents noted. To illustrate the effects of circulating antigen, data using MAb B43.13 (OVAREX, AltaRex Corp., Waltham, MA, USA) from a Pilot study in ovarian cancer patients are presented. The results from a Phase II study of MAb 170H.82 (Tru-Scint AD, BIOMIRA INC., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) in patients with primary and locally recurrent breast cancer were used to portray the biodistribution patterns when no circulating antigen is present. Data from planar gamma camera images were obtained for both groups and used for pharmacokinetic and radiation dosimetry analyses. RESULTS: A pharmacokinetic analysis indicated a shorter residence time and higher clearance of (99m)Tc-MAb-B43.13 that was ascribed in part to the circulating CA 125 antigen in this group of ovarian cancer patients. CONCLUSION: These clearance patterns resulted in acceptable, though higher radiation doses to the spleen and urinary bladder wall for these patients when compared to the MAb-170H.82 group. Both MAbs were found to produce acceptable radioimmunoscintigraphic images
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".