MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2405936166 · doi:10.14288/1.0092582

Land use impacts on ground and surface water quality in the Bertrand Creek watershed (Township of Langley, B.C.)

2010· article· en· W2405936166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Gabriela Solano

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Resources Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatershedEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Surface waterForestryGeographyEnvironmental engineeringGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bertrand Creek is a small transboundary watershed with mixed land use that provides a good case study to compare the impacts of urban and agricultural activities on water resources. Located in southeastern Langley, it encompasses the city of Aldergrove and an agricultural area that extends from south of Aldergrove to the Canada - US international border. The main goal of this study was to determine land use impacts on water quality. Water samples were analyzed for nutrients and dissolved elements and results were linked to land use through a GIS. Streambed sediments were analyzed for trace metals and bioavailability of metals was measured along Bertrand Creek using the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique. Land use didn't seem to be correlated to groundwater quality but results indicated that nitrate contamination in the Abbotsford aquifer is a concern. Well depth appeared to have a significant influence in the quality of groundwater and only wells <15 m deep exceeded the drinking water quality guidelines for NO₃ - N. Surface water analysis indicated high concentrations of nitrate and phosphorus, especially on Howes Creek. Correlation with land use data showed that high concentrations of manganese in surface water and concentrations of copper, lead and zinc in sediments were positively correlated to the extent of impervious surfaces. Nitrate - N concentrations were influenced by agricultural activities particularly during the wet season. It is therefore important that stormwater and agricultural best management practices be exercised, including the increase of riparian buffer areas, improved manure management and storage techniques and the construction of stormwater detention ponds, particularly at sites that receive direct runoff from heavily used roads. Despite the importance of the streams in this watershed to aquatic life there appears to be a significant lack of water quality studies and monitoring. The results of the present study warrant further research in the watershed to ensure a healthy habitat for aquatic life and to protect drinking water sources in rural areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicWater Quality and Resources StudiesFrench-language works237,207