RNA anchoring in the vegetal cortex of the <i>Xenopus</i> oocyte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The body plan of the embryo is established by a polarized source of developmental information in the oocyte. The Xenopus laevis oocyte creates polarity by anchoring mRNAs in the vegetal cortex, including Vg1 and Xwnt-11, which might function in body plan specification, and Xcat-2, which might function in germ cell development. To identify components of the RNA anchoring mechanism, we used the manually isolated vegetal cortex (IVC) to assay loss or change in spatial arrangement of mRNAs caused by disruption of cortical elements. The role of cytoskeleton in mRNA anchoring was tested by treating oocytes with inhibitors that selectively disrupted actin microfilaments and cytokeratin filaments. Treatment of oocytes with cytochalasin B caused clumping of Vg1 and Xwnt-11 as revealed by in situ hybridization of the IVC, but did not cause their release, as confirmed by RT-PCR analysis. These mRNA clumps did not match the distribution of actin microfilament clumps, but were distributed similarly to the remnant cytokeratin filaments. Treatment of oocytes with monoclonal anti-cytokeratin antibody C11 released these mRNAs from the cortex. C11 altered the texture of the cytokeratin network, but did not affect the actin meshwork. These results show that Vg1 and Xwnt-11 are retained by a cytokeratin filament-dependent mechanism, and that organization of the cytokeratin network depend on an intact actin meshwork. Colcemid did not disrupt Vg1 and Xwnt-11 retention in the IVC, so anchoring of these mRNAs are independent of microtubules. Membrane disruption in the IVC by Triton X-100 decreased Vg1 and Xwnt-11. Loss of these mRNAs was due mainly to ribonuclease activity released from membrane components. However, when ribonuclease activity was suppressed under cold temperature, a higher amount of Vg1 and Xwnt-11 was recovered in the supernatant. This result suggested that a fraction of these mRNAs required membranes to be retained in the cortex. By contrast, Xcat-2 mRNA was neither released nor degraded following treatments with cytochalasin B, C11, colcemid and Triton X-100 under cold temperature, so no cortical element could be implicated in its anchoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".