The kinetics and mechanisms of the reaction of Mesna with cisplatin, oxiplatin and carboplatin.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mesna is a sulfohydrate administered as a supportive drug in conjunction with oxazaphosphorines to prevent bladder toxicity from metabolites. When oxazaphosphorines are given simultaneously with platinum drugs, Mesna binds with platinum drugs as well. Previously we showed in cell culture, that Mesna reduces the efficacy of some platinum drugs. Here we elucidate the chemical reaction mechanism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cisplatin, Carboplatin and a novel platinum agent Oxiplatin were incubated with Mesna and the rate of disappearance of Mesna was measured, using an oxidation/reduction reaction between MTT and Mesna. RESULTS: All three platinum agents reacted with Mesna, but the chemical details differed largely. The molar ratios were 3:1, 2:1, and 1:1 for the reactions of Mesna with Oxiplatin, Cisplatin, and Carboplatin, respectively. The speed of the reaction followed a similar pattern, being fastest for Oxiplatin and slowest for Carboplatin. CONCLUSION: When considering the pharmacokinetics of Mesna and these platinum compounds and their reactivity, it appears unlikely that the reaction of Mesna with Carboplatin will become clinically relevant, while Cisplatin, might react with Mesna in patient serum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".