MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract P6-03-03: The Q-CROC-3 project reveals novel genomic alterations in triple negative breast cancers in residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

2016· article· en· W2406732508 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Basik, Adriana Aguilar‐Mahecha, Josiane Lafleur, Eric Bareke, Ewa Przybytkowski, Najmeh Alirezaie, Federico Discepola, Stéphanie Légaré, Bojan Kovacina, Chuan Lan, CL Mihalcioiu, A Robidoux, Elizabeth A. Marcus, J-A Roy, Manuella Pelmus, Olga Aleynikova, Sayed Mohammad Nabavi, Peter J. Tonellato, Jacek Majewski

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation CentreJewish General HospitalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerChemotherapyCancer researchTaxaneExome sequencingGene expression profilingTriple-negative breast cancerPrimary tumorKRASAnthracyclineMedicineMinimal residual diseaseCancerOncologyBiologyPathologyGeneInternal medicineGene expressionMetastasisMutationGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The prognosis of triple negative breast cancer that shows resistance and/or incomplete response to cytotoxic chemotherapy is poor. In order to understand the mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy and the genomic evolution of TNBCs treated with chemotherapy, an international multi-center biopsy-driven clinical trial was created for the collection and study of drug-resistant primary and metastatic freshly frozen tumors (Q-CROC-03: NCT01276899). We consented 60 patients with operable TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant Anthracycline/Taxane-based chemotherapy for pre and post-treatment biopsies as well as collection of residual tumor at the time of surgery and serial blood sampling. In 12-15 patients, adequate residual tumor material was available for genomic studies, which included whole exome sequencing, array CGH, gene expression microarray profiling and RNAseq of paired tumors. Whole exome sequencing revealed clonal shifts as well as the relatively infrequent appearance of novel mutations in individual tumors, without any recurrently detected variants. Array CGH revealed a remarkable stability in the number of DNA copy number alterations with a few functional alterations enriched for in the residual tumor, including an amplicon involving the NFIB gene. Finally, gene expression profiling showed shifts towards the immune-modulatory and basal TNBC subtypes after chemotherapy as well as an increase in the expression of several targetable genes, including DUSP1, a dual specificity phosphatase. In the 4 cases of primary and matching metastatic tumors, the post-NAC residual tumor had acquired changes many of which persisted in the metastatic sites, indicating that the analysis of the residual tumors can provide a partial picture of genomic changes present in metastases but not in the primary tumor. In summary, the genomic characterization of residual post-NAC tumor tissue provides important information for the development of novel therapeutic strategies for drug-resistant TNBCs as well as a portrait of genomic evolution of TNBCs subjected to chemotherapy. Citation Format: Basik M, Aguilar-Mahecha A, Lafleur J, Bareke E, Przybytkowski E, Alirezaie N, Discepola F, Légaré S, Kovacina B, Lan C, Mihalcioiu CL, Robidoux A, Marcus E, Roy J-A, Pelmus M, Aleynikova O, Nabavi S, Tonellato P, Majewski J. The Q-CROC-3 project reveals novel genomic alterations in triple negative breast cancers in residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-03.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies→French-language works237,207→