MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2406782120

An Accuracy-Oriented Divide-and-Conquer Strategy for Recognizing Textual Entailment.

2008· article· en· W2406782120 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rui Wang, Günter Neumann

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory and applications of categories · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDivide and conquer algorithmsPhysicsCombinatoricsMathematicsAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Two-Way Task: Run1: TAC-M, TS-M, and Tri-BM Run2: TAC-M, TS-M, and BoW-BM Run3: TAC-M, TS-M, NE-M, & Tri-BM, BoW-BM The Three-Way Task: Run1: TAC-M, TS-M, and Tri-BM, BoWBM Run2: TAC-M, TS-M, NE-M (partial), and Tri-BM, BoW-BM Run3: TAC-M, TS-M, NE-M, and Tri-BM, BoW-BM From Two-Way to Three-Way: If BoW-BM=YES & Tri-BM=NO then CONTRADICTION If BoW-BM=YES & Tri-BM=YES then ENTAILMENT Others UNKNOWN Tasks TAC-M TS-M NE-M BoW-BM Tri-BM Run1 Run2 Run3 IR(300) 75.0%/4 76.5%/85 61.0%/164 63.3% 54.3% 66.0% 72.3% 71.7% QA(200) 90.0%/10 73.2%/82 54.8%/93 49.0% 53.5% 73.0% 72.0% 74.0% SUM(200) 83.3%/6 74.5%/51 55.2%/67 63.5% 54.0% 64.0% 69.5% 71.5%

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheory and applications of categoriesSame topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207