MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407041458 · doi:10.1190/geo2015-0383.1

A simple hydromechanical approach for simulating squirt-type flow

2016· article· en· W2407041458 on OpenAlexaff
Beatriz Quintal, J. Germán Rubino, Eva Caspari, Klaus Holliger

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersSwiss Competence Center for Energy Research – Supply of Electricity
KeywordsMesoscopic physicsBiot numberMechanicsDissipationLaminar flowFluid dynamicsFlow (mathematics)GeologyPoromechanicsAttenuationBoundary value problemPhysicsPorous mediumGeotechnical engineeringPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The deformations caused by an acoustic wavefield in subsurface rock can induce fluid flow within hydraulically interconnected mesoscopic fractures, from one fracture into the other. The viscous friction associated with this squirt-type fluid flow parallel to the fracture walls results in energy dissipation and velocity dispersion. We have developed a quasi-static hydromechanical approach that is suitable for simulating squirt-type flow in the mesoscopic scale range and microscopic squirt flow. Our approach couples Navier-Stokes equation with Hooke’s law to describe the laminar flow of a viscous compressible fluid in conduits embedded in an elastic solid background. Results from the proposed method were compared with those obtained with Biot’s equations for a model containing interconnected mesoscopic fractures embedded in a background of very low porosity and permeability. Despite significant differences in the flow and dissipation spatial patterns, we have observed an essentially perfect agreement of the attenuation and modulus dispersion characteristics predicted by the two approaches. The difference in the flow and dissipation spatial patterns are associated with the “upscaling” inherent to Biot’s equations and, correspondingly, with differing boundary conditions at the fracture walls. Our results demonstrate that the proposed hydromechanical approach can provide additional insights on the physics of squirt-type flow in the mesoscopic and microscopic scale ranges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207