MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407139028

Valve surgery in octogenarians: a safe option with good medium-term results.

2006· article· en· W2407139028 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Chukwuemeka, Michael A. Borger, Joan Ivanov, Susan Armstrong, Christopher M. Feindel, Tirone E. David

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryPerioperativeAtrial fibrillationConcomitantMyocardial infarctionStroke (engine)Coronary artery diseaseRetrospective cohort studyMitral valveHeart failureAortic valve replacementAortic valveInternal medicineStenosis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The number of octogenarians is increasing in industrialized societies, and many patients aged over 80 years have heart valve disease which is amenable to surgical treatment. The perioperative outcomes and long-term results in very elderly patients undergoing valve surgery were evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 2,791 patients with long-term follow up, who underwent valve surgery between 1990 and 2002. Of these patients, 132 (68 males, 64 females) were aged over 80 years (mean age 82 +/- 2 years; range: 80-94 years). RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (71.9%) underwent aortic valve replacement, 36 (27.3%) mitral surgery, and one patient had double-valve surgery. Sixty-five patients (49.2%) required concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. There were 11 (8.3%) redo procedures. Patients aged over 80 years were significantly more symptomatic preoperatively than their younger counterparts (NYHA class III-IV 90.9% versus 69.0%, p < 0.001), with more congestive cardiac failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, obstructive pulmonary disease, and renal failure (all p < 0.05). Perioperative mortality did not, however, differ significantly between groups (< 80 years versus > or = 80 years, 2.9% versus 4.6%, p = 0.10). There was also no difference in the composite end point of in-hospital death, renal failure, stroke, low output state, myocardial infarction, or sternal wound infection (< 80 years versus > or = 80 years, 10.5% versus 11.4%, p = 0.8). The mean follow up period was 66 +/- 44 months (< 80 years) versus 61 +/- 37 (> or = 80 years). Late mortality was higher in the elderly group (10-year survival 37.9% versus 68.2%, p < 0.001) and preoperative atrial fibrillation (RR 2.75; CI: 1.44-5.23), coronary artery disease (RR 1.98; CI 1.12-3.52) and congestive cardiac failure (RR 2.13; CI: 1.10-4.11) were independent predictors of late mortality. The groups did not differ with respect to long-term valve-related events, with the exception of fewer reoperations among elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Valve surgery in selected octogenarians is associated with low morbidity and mortality. The outlook after surgery is very good, and surgery should not be denied to this group on the basis of age alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207