MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407254283 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv133.1098

Management Challenges of Prosthetic Joint Infections at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

2015· article· en· W2407254283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lucas Castellani, Nick Daneman, Samira Mubareka, Richard Jenkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamily medicineGerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are becoming more common; however, there is a lack of high-grade evidence to guide therapy of these complex infections. We sought to assess current practice heterogeneity at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC) and Holland Orthopedic and Arthritic Centre (HOAC) and assess surgical and antibiotic strategies associated with clinical outcomes. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients with PJI who had revision surgery between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2010 at SHSC/ HOAC. PJI were identified using the Ontario Joint Replacement Record System. Infection was defined by gross intraoperative evidence, positive intraoperative culture, and/or sinus tract prior to operation. The primary outcome was treatment failure at one year after revision surgery based on further surgery, ongoing infection and/or continuous suppressive antibiotics. Results. Of the 139 patients with PJI, 85 (61%) involved knees and 50 (36%) hips. For the initial procedure, 29 (21%) underwent I&D, 35 (25%) one-stage, and 75 (54%) two-stage revisions. Of 81 (58%) culture positive cases, CNST (47;34%) and Staphylococcus aureus (18;13%) were the most common pathogens The overall treatment success rate was 78% (95% CI: 70-84). There was no difference in outcome between one-stage (94%; 95% CI: 81-98) and two-stage revisions (84%; 95% CI: 74-91). Only 41% (95%; CI: 26-59) of I&D procedures were successful. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed I&D associated with high failure rates (odds ratio = 102.4; 95% CI: 8.6-1225.3), with a trend towards lower failure rates with one versus two-stage revision (odds ratio = 0.028, 95% CI: 0.001-1.500). Other predictors of treatment failure included history of prior revisions, and infection with Peptostreptococcus spp. Among two-stage revisions, we did not detect a significant reduction in treatment failure associated with antibiotic-free period prior to the second procedure (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.23-29.8). Conclusion. Our findings question the value of customary approaches to prosthetic joint infection management such as the use of two stage procedures and antibiotic-free periods prior to definitive revision. Randomized controlled trials are needed to inform best practice for treatment of these complex infections. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207