MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of ibrutinib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in subjects with newly diagnosed nongerminal center B-cell subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

2014· article· en· W2407327553 on OpenAlexaff
Anas Younes, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Laurie H. Sehn, Peter Johnson, Randy D. Gascoyne, Tahamtan Ahmadi, Kevin M. Bellew, Jessica Vermeulen, Sen Hong Zhuang, Steven Sun, Louis M. Staudt, Wyndham H. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIbrutinibMedicineVincristineInternal medicineOncologyRituximabCHOPDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaCyclophosphamideLymphomaChemotherapyChronic lymphocytic leukemiaLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS8615^ Background: The standard regimen for frontline treatment of DLBCL is R-CHOP, which results in a complete response (CR) in 76% of patients and a 10-year overall survival (OS) rate of 44%. DLBCL can be classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) into 2 subgroups: germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) or non-GCB (including the activated B-cell-like and some intermediate molecular subtypes). Prognosis is suggested to be least favorable for non-GCB DLBCL, the subgroup associated with NF-κB pathway activation and chronic active B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling. Ibrutinib inhibits BCR signaling by covalently binding to Bruton's tyrosine kinase. A phase 2 monotherapy study in relapsed/refractory DLBCL showed a 41% overall response rate (ORR) in the non-GCB subgroup (ASH 2012). A phase 1 study combining ibrutinib with R-CHOP showed an ORR of 100% in DLBCL and a favorable safety profile (ASH 2013), suggesting that ibrutinib can be safely combined with R-CHOP. Methods: The PHOENIX study, PCI32765DBL3001, is a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of ibrutinib in combination with R-CHOP versus R-CHOP for the treatment of newly diagnosed non-GCB DLBCL. The study aims to enroll 800 patients (≈400 per arm). All patients will receive standard doses of R-CHOP therapy for 6 or 8 cycles (according to local practice), with ibrutinib 560 mg daily or placebo. The primary objective is to evaluate if the addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP will result in prolongation of event-free survival. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, OS, ORR (CR + PR), CR rate, and safety. The study will enroll previously untreated adult patients with the non-GCB subgroup of DLBCL determined by central IHC (Hans algorithm). Key exclusion criteria include central nervous system involvement or primary mediastinal lymphoma, diagnosis or treatment for malignancy other than DLBCL, or history of indolent lymphoma. Approximately 280 sites globally will enroll patients. Enrollment began in Q4 of 2013. Clinical trial information: NCT01855750.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207