MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vehicle Park Management Through The Goal Programming Model

2003· article· en· W2407427287 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Hamid Goghrod, Jean‐Marc Martel, Belaı̈d Aouni

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère des Transports
KeywordsGoal programmingProcess managementComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementBusinessOperations researchEngineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThe “Ministère des transports du Québec” has a fleet of equipment to maintain the roads of the province of Quebec. The management of the fleet is the responsibility of the “Centre de Gestion de l’équipement Roulant”. They decide whether an old item of equipment will be sold, replaced or maintained. Several factors, sometimes conflicting, come into play in the decision making process. They include reducing the fleet by 20%, respecting the budget, meeting the customer requirements, and maintaining and renovating certain aspects of the equipment. As a management tool, we propose Goal Programming model with the integration of the decision-maker’s preferences,RésuméLe Ministère des Transports du Québec dispose d’une flotte d’équipements pour l’entretien des routes de la province du Québec. L’unité responsable de la gestion de ce parc est le Centre de Gestion de l’équipement Roulant qui doit décider pour chaque unité ou équipement soit de continuer à l’entretenir, le vendre ou le remplacer. Plusieurs facteurs, souvent conflictuels, sont à considérer lors du processus décisionnel tels que : réduire la flotte de 20%, respecter l’enveloppe budgétaire, répondre aux besoins des clients ou encore maintenir un certain rajeunissement du parc. Dans le présent document, nous proposons comme outil de gestion le modèle du “Goal Programming” avec l’intégration des préférences du gestionnaire.Key words:: Vehicle Park ManagementGoal Programming ModelManagers’ PreferencesSatisfaction Functions.Mots-clés:: la gestion du parc des équipements roulantsle modèle du Goal Programmingles préférences des gestionnairesles fonctions de satisfaction. Additional informationNotes on contributorsHamid GoghrodHamid Goghrod is a Canada Customs and Revenu Agency employee. He received his MBA in management sciences from Laval univesity (Quebec) and MSC in eanh sciences from université du Québec à Chtcoutimi. His current research interest focus on multi-objective programmingJean-Marc MartelJean-Marc Martel est professeur émèrite de la Faculté des Sciences de l’Administration de l’université Laval. Ses principaux intérts de recherche portent sur l’aide multicritère à la décision dans un environnement incertain, sur l’aide à la décision en groupe et sur les démarches participatives. Il est l’auteur ou le co-auteur de plusieurs volumes, de très nombreuses publications dans des revues académiques et professionnelles et a contribué à un bon nombre d’ouvrages collectifs.Belaïd AouniBelaïd Aouni is a professor at School of Commerce and Administration at Laurentian University. He holds a Ph.D. and a master degree in management science from Laval university. His research is published in scientific journals such as Operational Research Society, Journal of Global Optimization, Information Systems ami Operational Research and European Journal of Operational Research. His research interest includes multi-criteria decision aid, multi-objective programming and goal programming, optimization and operations management. Currently, he is the Vice-President of the Canadian Operational Research Society. He is also a member of several scientific associations in operational research and administrative sciences such as INFORMS and ASAC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207