MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vehicle Park Management Through The Goal Programming Model

2003· article· en· W2407427287 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Hamid Goghrod, Jean‐Marc Martel, Belaı̈d Aouni

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère des Transports
KeywordsGoal programmingProcess managementComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementBusinessOperations researchEngineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The “Ministère des transports du Québec” has a fleet of equipment to maintain the roads of the province of Quebec. The management of the fleet is the responsibility of the “Centre de Gestion de l’équipement Roulant”. They decide whether an old item of equipment will be sold, replaced or maintained. Several factors, sometimes conflicting, come into play in the decision making process. They include reducing the fleet by 20%, respecting the budget, meeting the customer requirements, and maintaining and renovating certain aspects of the equipment. As a management tool, we propose Goal Programming model with the integration of the decision-maker’s preferences,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207