MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407449958

PSOATransRun: Translating and Running PSOA RuleML via the TPTP Interchange Language for Theorem Provers.

2012· article· en· W2407449958 on OpenAlexaff
Gen Zou, Reuben Peter-Paul, Harold Boley, Alexandre Riazanov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuleMLComputer scienceProgramming languageSemantic reasonerParsingSyntaxXHTMLXMLArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebMarkup language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. PSOA RuleML is an object-relational rule language general-izing POSL, OO RuleML, F-logic, and RIF-BLD. In PSOA RuleML, the notion of positional-slotted, object-applicative (psoa) terms is used as a generalization of: (1) positional-slotted terms in POSL and OO RuleML and (2) frame and class-membership terms in F-logic and RIF-BLD. We demonstrate an online PSOA RuleML reasoning service, PSOATransRun, consisting of a translator and an execution engine. The translator, PSOA2TPTP, maps knowledge bases and queries in the PSOA RuleML presentation syntax to the popular TPTP interchange language, which is supported by many first-order logic theorem provers. The trans-lated documents are then executed by the open-source VampirePrime reasoner to perform query answering. In our implementation, we use the ANTLR v3 parser generator tool to build the translator based on the grammars we developed. We wrap the translator and execution engine as resources into a RESTful Web API for convenient access. The presen-tation demonstrates PSOATransRun with a suite of examples that also constitute an online-interactive introduction to PSOA RuleML. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207