Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy and Plasma ß-Endorphin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an attempt to determine whether hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in and of itself or its associated pathologic conditions lead to increased concentrations of plasma beta-endorphin (beta-ED), measurements were made in three groups of term infants. Group 1 (control) consisted of 8 infants with a mean gestation of 38.6 +/- (SE) 0.4 weeks, a mean birth weight of 3,420 +/- 150 g, and a mean postnatal age of 1.4 +/- 0.7 days. Group 2 consisted of 10 infants with a mean gestational age, birth weight and postnatal age of 40.1 +/- 0.5 weeks, 3,310 +/- 80 g and 3,9 +/- 1.1 days, and group 3 included 6 infants with a mean gestational age, birth weight and postnatal age of 40.4 +/- 1 weeks, 3,650 +/- 310 g, and 2.8 +/- 1 days, respectively. The group 2 and 3 infants suffered clinical and neurological evidence of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury from perinatal asphyxia; however, the infants in group 2 suffered additional problems such as meconium aspiration, persistent fetal circulation with ongoing hypoxemia as measured by transcutaneous or umbilical arterial oxygen monitoring. The group 3 infants were normoxemic after resuscitation. The mean plasma beta-ED concentrations were 19 +/- (SE) 2.7, 103 +/- 35.7 and 25 +/- 4.5 pg/ml in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. A significant elevation of plasma beta-ED concentration was observed in group 2 when compared to groups 1 and 3. The association of increased plasma beta-ED concentration in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy associated with ongoing hypoxemia suggests that hypoxemia may act as a strong stimulus for plasma beta-ED release in term infants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".